Yesterday, stock markets just wanted to âbelieveâ.
The eurozone deal had been done. And we learned that US GDP grew at a 2.5% annual rate in the third quarter, almost double the previous three months. Any bad news was ignored. The FTSE 100 climbed 2.6% while European markets jumped some 6%.
But donât be fooled. As my colleague John Stepek pointed out in yesterdayâs Money Morning, economies in Europe â and indeed the world â arenât cured yet.
So we think you should stick to investing in âdefensiveâ stocks. For one thing, they donât need economic growth to make their profits. For another, several defensives offer inflation-matching yields.
Britainâs âbig pharmaâ stocks are a good example. But if youâre not already invested in the sector, which is the best share to buy now?
Healthcare stocks look good value
Regardless of how weak the global economy is, people around the world will need to spend money on healthcare, as weâve discussed several times before. Thatâs why global âbig pharmaâ firms have been able to generate ever-increasing streams of profits and cash flows.
So, youâd have thought the sector would be a popular one with investors. Yet over much of the last decade, big pharma has fallen out of favour. Stocks in the sector have been savagely de-rated. In other words, their p/e ratios have tumbled as investors have placed less value on these companiesâ future earnings.
Why? There are risks surrounding big pharma, such as lawsuits over defective products with nasty side effects. But the main worry for investors has been the so-called âpatent cliffâ.
Many former blockbuster drugs either have lost, or will soon lose, their patent protection. That means these medicines can then be copied by âgenericâ rivals and sold on the cheap. In turn, thereâll be less profit to be made from these products.
Indeed, between 2011 and 2016, $255bn-worth of annual sales of the worldâs top-selling drugs will go off patent, says researcher EvaluatePharma. That compares with global industry revenues of $880bn. That doesnât sound too promising. So why would the big pharma sector appeal to investors now?
The patent cliff is in the price
Hereâs why. The patent cliff might be steep. But itâs also an extremely obvious problem â you can see it coming from miles away. As a result, by now it has been fully âdiscountedâ, ie, itâs well and truly baked into the share prices of major drug makers.
And all the while that investors have been fretting about this patent cliff and shunning the sector, big pharmaâs earnings have been growing, and its dividend payouts have too. Along with lower share prices, this means the sector now contains both cheap stocks and some well-above-average dividend yields.
Thereâs more good news, too. The big drug companies have been steadily dealing with those lawsuits we mentioned earlier. Theyâre also taking action to offset potential patent cliff damage to their sales. They may have been trading water on the replacement drugs front in the past. But now theyâre getting their act together in stepping up the search for new blockbuster medicines. Theyâre also diversifying into areas like vaccines, and looking for new places to sell their wares.
And hereâs where we come to this weekâs big pharma news. UK giant GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) has just announced its 2011 third-quarter results. Underlying sales grew 6% while earnings before restructuring charges were also up. But the real message was in the outlook statement.
GSK boss Andrew Witty has been shifting the firmâs drug portfolio away from relying on âwhite pills in Western marketsâ. Thereâs now much more focus on consumer healthcare and developing economies. Sales outside America and Europe grew by 17% in the third quarter and now account for 38% of overall revenues.
More of the same is in store. Sure, there may be some short-term economic wobbles. But Mr Witty says that in the long run, heâs âan extreme bullâ on emerging markets because of their growth potential.
And GSK is happy to show its confidence in the future. The long-term share buyback programme is continuing: the company spending its own money on its shares is a good sign for other investors. But rather more important for small shareholders is the latest hike in the quarterly dividend.
The payout is being lifted by 6% to 17p per share. That puts GSK on a 5% prospective yield for 2011. And if history is any guide, thereâll be a similar increase next year, which would lift the yield to around 5.2%.
Not bad. However, while GSK has been one of our favourite big pharma shares for a while â itâs up 15% since we tipped it in February – on a p/e of more than 12 for the current year, itâs a bit pricier than it was. So while Iâd be happy to hold it, I reckon thereâs even better value elsewhere.
Rival AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) also turned in third-quarter figures this week. Sales in US dollars – the firmâs accounting currency – were up 4%, while earnings per share increased by 14%.
Again, the company is working hard to grow its product portfolio. And while Astra doesnât pay quarterly dividends, analysts expect that the full-year payment will be lifted by around 6.5%.
That would put Astra on a prospective yield of almost 5.7%. The 2011 forecast p/e, meanwhile, is below seven. Even factoring in a small earnings drop in for next year, the p/e would still be under eight. That makes AstraZeneca a very cheap share indeed.
Category: Market updates