The problem with authority

Five years into a great bull run for the stock market, equities might seem invulnerable. Many believe they are the only game in town. With deposit rates at rock-bottom levels and the yields on traditional government bonds (and therefore also most corporate bonds) pitifully low, there’s a superficial logic to the equity story. But it critically ignores one gigantic elephant in the room: the future path of interest rates.

I think it’s time to make some pre-emptive action against rates. Call it too much belief in authority. We only need to look to history for evidence. One of the most famous examples was the Milgram tests, a series of experiments run by Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram in 1961.

The Milgram tests

Each test involved three participants. Two of them – the one co-ordinating the experiment, and the so-called ‘learner’, were ‘in’ on the experiment. The third, the supposed ‘teacher’, was the unwitting subject of it.

So, the teacher began by reading a list of word pairs to the learner. Then they would read the first word of each pair again, and four possible ways to complete it. The learner would press a button to indicate his response.

If the answer was incorrect, the teacher would be instructed to deliver an electric shock to the learner. Each wrong answer increased the voltage by 15 volts.

The ‘teacher’ participants believed the shocks were real. They weren’t. The ‘learners’ were all actors, the electric shocks faked. But that didn’t stop 65% of the participants in Milgram’s first experiment administering the final massive 450-volt dose.

Every time any teacher was hesitant to continue delivering (and enhancing) the shocks, he was told by the experimenter:

1. Please continue.
2. The experiment requires that you continue.
3. It is absolutely essential that you continue.
4. You have no other choice, you must go on.

If a teacher still wanted to stop after receiving all of these verbal cues, the experiment was halted. Otherwise, it was halted only after the learner had received the maximum 450-volt shock three times in a row.

Milgram’s experiment started three months after the trial of the German Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann began in Jerusalem. Milgram set out to answer the question: could it be that Eichmann, and those like him, were simply ‘obeying orders’?

In the Milgram experiment, the bogeyman authority figure was not a senior army officer. It was just a man in a white coat, armed only with a clipboard.

Obedience and the system

Summarising his experiment, Milgram wrote: “Stark authority was pitted against the subjects’ strongest moral imperatives against hurting others, and, with the subjects’ ears ringing with the screams of the victims, authority won more often than not.

“Ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process”.

Milgram’s results are hardly unique. Before this type of experiment was banned, they were carried out in universities around the world. The results were remarkably similar.

But what does all this mean for investment?

For Stanley Milgram, authority was a man in a white coat. For me, authority is the US Federal Reserve. In fact, it’s any central banker. And they are all just as susceptible to the corruption of power as the participants in the studies listed above.

The individuals working at central banks are probably normal and well-intentioned. But they operate within a perverse system, which does the world a great deal of damage.

Western central banks are dangerous for a number of reasons.

Quantitative easing (QE) – The QE programmes they have pushed so aggressively have distorted relative prices across all asset types. They have only delayed the inevitable deleveraging.

Artificially low rates  Having driven policy rates down to zero, they have forced investors to chase yield. That means exposing themselves to higher degrees of risk than they might have otherwise. That’s because cash deposits have effectively been eliminated as a viable investment choice.

Kicking the can down the road – In pumping up the money supply (and their balance sheets), they have set the scene for a potentially dangerous inflationary mess further down the line.

A false sense of security – Many investors accept that the central banks know what they are doing. Even that “they have everyone’s back”, or what used to be known as the ‘Greenspan put’ – supporting equity markets – is alive and well. That’s even as his successor, Ben Bernanke, passes the baton to Janet Yellen.

Don’t fight the Fed

In the markets, there’s a simple rule of thumb: don’t fight the Fed.

Given its almost unlimited monetary firepower, it has never made sense to bet against Fed policy. But that was before the Fed and its international peers went ‘all-in’ with quantitative easing.

Now the West’s central bankers have an existential problem: their influence over markets only works while investors believe that that influence still holds.

The Fed is now faced with a market that expects a ‘taper’. It won’t be disappointed. It will be a modest one, though, with monthly monetary stimulus and credit purchases falling from $85bn to $75bn.

Any abandonment of tapering runs the risk of spooking markets, like last summer. Back then the Fed blinked in the face of a nervous bond market. The result was a market rout, and ten-year US Treasury yields shooting up – from 1.6% in May to 3% in September.

An eye on 2014

Long story short – I think the lesson for 2014 is clear.

Be wary of rising interest rates. Short-term monetary policy rates can stay anchored near zero in both the US and the UK, even though such emergency measures are no longer warranted.

Prevailing economic conditions are improving. But neither the Fed nor the Bank of England can prevent yields from rising in longer-dated government debt markets. And if higher bond yields do arrive this year, equity markets are unlikely to be immune to it.

• This article was first published in The Price Report newsletter.

The Price Report is a regulated product issued by Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares, never risk more than you can afford to lose. Please seek independent financial advice if necessary. Customer services: 0207 633 3600.

Category: Economics

From time to time we may tell you about regulated products issued by Southbank Investment Research Limited. With these products your capital is at risk. You can lose some or all of your investment, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Seek independent advice if you are unsure of the suitability of any investment. Southbank Investment Research Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA No 706697. https://register.fca.org.uk/.

© 2021 Southbank Investment Research Ltd. Registered in England and Wales No 9539630. VAT No GB629 7287 94.
Registered Office: 2nd Floor, Crowne House, 56-58 Southwark Street, London, SE1 1UN.

Terms and conditions | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | FAQ | Contact Us | Top ↑